GMJ Medicine
eISSN : 2626-3041
Embase
Biosis Previews
description
Volume 3, Issue 1 (2024)
GMJM 2024, 3(1): 13-17 |
Back to browse issues page
History
Received: 2023/08/12 | Accepted: 2023/12/15 | Published: 2024/02/3
Received: 2023/08/12 | Accepted: 2023/12/15 | Published: 2024/02/3
How to cite this article
Dodangheh M, Mokhtari T, Mojaverrostami S, Nemati M, Zarbakhsh S, Arabkheradmand A et al . Facial Index of Tehran University of Medical Sciences’ Medical Students; an Anthropometric Study. GMJM 2024; 3 (1) :13-17
URL: http://gmedicine.de/article-2-244-en.html
URL: http://gmedicine.de/article-2-244-en.html
Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Rights and permissions
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:
Authors
M. Dodangheh1, T. Mokhtari2, S. Mojaverrostami1, M. Nemati1, S. Zarbakhsh2, A. Arabkheradmand3, Gh. Hassanzadeh *1
1- Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran
2- “Nervous System Stem Cells Research Center” and “Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine”, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
3- Department of Surgery, Cancer Institute, Breast Cancer Research Center, Tehran, Iran
2- “Nervous System Stem Cells Research Center” and “Department of Anatomy, School of Medicine”, Semnan University of Medical Sciences, Semnan, Iran
3- Department of Surgery, Cancer Institute, Breast Cancer Research Center, Tehran, Iran
Abstract (1103 Views)
Aims: Facial anthropometry is useful in individual identification and reconstructive surgery. In the present study, we aimed to determine the facial characteristic of the Iranian population through anthropometric study.
Materials & Methods: In a cross sectional study, 200 (100 male and 100 female) volunteer medical students (aged 20-25 years) of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were selected. The facial variables including total facial height, upper facial height and facial width were measured and accordingly the total facial index and upper facial index were calculated. The data were analyzed using statistical software (SPSS).
Findings: The mean age of subjects was 22.97±1.12 years. The mean total facial height, upper facial height, facial width, total facial index, and upper facial index were 11.155cm, 7.05cm, 11.68cm, 95.75 and 60.55, respectively. The most common types of face were hyperleptoprosopic (54%) and hyperleptene (54%). There were significant differences in total facial height (p<0.0001), upper facial height (p<0.0001), facial width (p=0.02), total facial index (p<0.0001), and upper facial index (p<0.0001) between males and females.
Conclusion: The most frequent face type is hyperleptoprosopic in Iranian population. Additionally, the values of facial characteristics are higher in males than females. So, sexual dimorphism was recorded according to the facial measurements of Iranian population which can be considered in the reconstructive surgeries.
Materials & Methods: In a cross sectional study, 200 (100 male and 100 female) volunteer medical students (aged 20-25 years) of Tehran University of Medical Sciences were selected. The facial variables including total facial height, upper facial height and facial width were measured and accordingly the total facial index and upper facial index were calculated. The data were analyzed using statistical software (SPSS).
Findings: The mean age of subjects was 22.97±1.12 years. The mean total facial height, upper facial height, facial width, total facial index, and upper facial index were 11.155cm, 7.05cm, 11.68cm, 95.75 and 60.55, respectively. The most common types of face were hyperleptoprosopic (54%) and hyperleptene (54%). There were significant differences in total facial height (p<0.0001), upper facial height (p<0.0001), facial width (p=0.02), total facial index (p<0.0001), and upper facial index (p<0.0001) between males and females.
Conclusion: The most frequent face type is hyperleptoprosopic in Iranian population. Additionally, the values of facial characteristics are higher in males than females. So, sexual dimorphism was recorded according to the facial measurements of Iranian population which can be considered in the reconstructive surgeries.
Keywords:
| | Full-Text (HTML) (36 Views)
References
1. Mohammed I, Mokhtari T, Ijaz S, Ngaski AA, Milanifard M, Hassanzadeh G. Anthropometric study of nasal index in Hausa ethnic population of northwestern Nigeria. J Contemp Med Sci. 2018;4(1). [Link] [DOI:10.22317/jcms.03201806]
2. Bayat M, Shariati M, Rajaeirad F, Yekaninejad MS, Momen Heravi F, Davoudmanesh Z. Facial anthropometric norms of the young Iranian population. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2018;17(2):150-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12663-016-0897-3]
3. Azizi M, Hassanzadeh G, Barbarestani M, Sadr M, Dehbashipour A, Alaghbandha N, et al. Comparative anthropometric analysis of facial dimensions and types in Qazvin, Iran and DeraGhazi Khan, Pakistan. Anat Sci J. 2014;11(3):119-26. [Persian] [Link]
4. Abu A, Ngo CG, Abu Hassan NIA, Othman SA. Automated craniofacial landmarks detection on 3D image using geometry characteristics information. BMC Bioinformatics. 2019;19(13):548. [Link] [DOI:10.1186/s12859-018-2548-9]
5. Moshkdanian G, Mahaki Zadeh S, Moghani Ghoroghi F, Mokhtari T, Hassanzadeh G. Estimation of stature from the anthropometric measurement of lower limb in Iranian adults. Anatomic Sci J. 2014;11(3):149-54. [Link]
6. Ojaimi E, Morgan IG, Robaei D, Rose KA, Smith W, Rochtchina E, et al. Effect of stature and other anthropometric parameters on eye size and refraction in a population- based study of Australian children. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46(12):4424-9. [Link] [DOI:10.1167/iovs.05-0077]
7. Halberstein R. The application of anthropometric indices in forensic photography: Three case studies. J Forensic Sci. 2001;46(6):1438-41. [Link] [DOI:10.1520/JFS15168J]
8. Akhlaghi M, Sheikhazadi A, Khosravi N, Pournia Y, Anary SHS. The value of the anthropometric parameters of the tibia in the forensic identification of the Iranian population over the age of 20. J Forensic Leg Med. 2011;18(6):257-63. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.jflm.2011.05.001]
9. Ngeow W, Aljunid S. Craniofacial anthropometric norms of Malaysian Indians. Indian J Dent Res. 2009;20(3):313-9. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/0970-9290.57372]
10. Hassanzadeh G, Sadr M, Alaghbandha N, Dehbashipour A, Abbas MA, Heydar Zeidi O. Anthropometric characteristics of craniums in residents of Qazvin, Iran and Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan: A comparative study. Anat Sci J. 2013;10(1):43-9. [Persian] [Link]
11. Navaei F, Ghaffari N, Mojaverrostami S, Dodongeh M, Nemati M, Hassanzadeh G. Stature estimation from facial measurements in medical students of Tehran university of Medical Sciences: An Iranian population. Iraq Med J. 2018;2(3):68-71. [Link]
12. Remya KJ, Mathangi K, Mathangi DC, Sriteja Y, Srihari R, Govindaraju S, et al. Predictive value of craniofacial and anthropometric measures in obstructive sleep apnea (OSA). Cranio. 2017;35(3):162-7. [Link] [DOI:10.1080/08869634.2016.1206701]
13. Perri RA, Kairaitis K, Wheatley JR, Amis TC. Anthropometric and craniofacial sexual dimorphism in obstructive sleep apnea patients: Is there male- female phenotypical convergence?. J. Sleep Res. 2015;24(1):82-91. [Link] [DOI:10.1111/jsr.12205]
14. Karakas S, Tellioglu AM, Bilgin M, Omurlu IK, Caliskan S, Coskun S. Craniofacial characteristics of thalassemia major patients. Eurasian J Med. 2016;48(3):204-8. [Link] [DOI:10.5152/eurasianjmed.2016.150013]
15. Asha KR, Lakshmiprabha S, Nanjaiah CM, Prashanth SN. Craniofacial anthropometric analysis in Down syndrome. Indian J Pediatr. 2011;78(9):1091-5. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12098-011-0377-1]
16. Bagic I, Verzak Z. Craniofacial anthropometric analysis in Down's syndrome patients. Coll Antropol. 2003;27:23-30. [Link]
17. Jaberi KR, Kavakebian F, Mojaverrostami S, Najibi A, Safari M, Hassanzadeh G, et al. Nasofacial anthropometric study among students of Shiraz university of medical sciences, Iran: A population based study. Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019;71:1-6. [Link] [DOI:10.1007/s12070-018-01578-7]
18. Omotoso D, Oludiran O, Sakpa C. Nasofacial anthropometry of adult Bini tribe in Nigeria. Afr J Biomed Res. 2011;14(3):219-21. [Link]
19. Husein OF, Sepehr A, Garg R, Sina Khadiv M, Gattu S, Waltzman J, et al. Anthropometric and aesthetic analysis of the Indian American woman's face. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2010;63(11):1825-31. [Link] [DOI:10.1016/j.bjps.2009.10.032]
20. Poorhassan M, Mokhtari T, Navid S, Rezaei M, Sheikhazadi A, Mojaverrostami S, et al. Stature estimation from forearm length: An anthropological study in Iranian medical students. J Contemp Med Sci. 2017;3(11):270-2. [Link] [DOI:10.22317/jcms.09201705]
21. Mojaverrostami S, Mokhtari T, Malekzadeh M, Noori L, Kazemzadeh S, Ijaz S, et al. Stature estimation based on fingers anthropom-etry in Iranian population. Anat Sci 2017;14(4):163-8. [Persian] [Link]
22. Novita M. Facial, upper facial, and orbital index in Batak, Klaten, and Flores students of Jember University. Dent J 2006;39(3):116-9. [Link] [DOI:10.20473/j.djmkg.v39.i3.p116-119]
23. Gallardo CAC, Galdames ICS, López MGC, Matamala DAZ. Relationship between pterygopalatine fossa volume and cephalic and upper facial indexes. Int J Morphol. 2008;26:393-6. [Link] [DOI:10.4067/S0717-95022008000200023]
24. Trivedi H, Azam A, Tandon R, Chandra P, Kulshrestha R, Gupta A. Correlation between morphological facial index and canine relationship in adults- an anthropometric study. J Orofac Sci. 2017;9(1):16-21. [Link] [DOI:10.4103/jofs.jofs_50_16]
25. Navid S, Mokhtari T, Alizamir T, Arabkheradmand A, Hassanzadeh G. Determination of stature from upper arm length in medical students. Anat Sci J. 2014;11(3):135-40. [Link]
26. Yesmin T, Thwin SS, Afrin Urmi S, Wai MM, Zaini P, Azwan K. A study of facial index among Malay population. J Anthropol. 2014:2014:1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.1155/2014/726974]
27. Doni RPK, Vijayaraghavan V. A study on measurement and correlation of cephalic and facial indices in males of South Indian population. Int J Med Res Health Sci. 2013;2(3):439-46. [Link] [DOI:10.5958/j.2319-5886.2.3.076]
28. Moore KL, Persaud T Before we are born: Essentials of embryology and birth defects. Philadelphia: W.B. Saunders Company; 1999. [Link]
29. Jahanshahi M, Golalipour M, Heidari K. The effect of ethnicity on facial anthropometry in Northern Iran. Singapore Med J. 2008;49(11):940-3. [Link]
30. Kurnia C, Susiana S, Husin W. Facial indices in Chinese ethnic students aged 20-22. J Dent Indones. 2013;19(1):1-4. [Link] [DOI:10.14693/jdi.v19i1.121]
31. Heidari Z, Mahmoudzadeh Sagheb H, Khammar T , Khammar M. Anthropometric measurements of the external nose in 18-25- year- old Sistani and Baluch aborigine women in the southeast of Iran. Folia Morphol. 2009;68(2):88-92. [Link]
32. Din TNDT, Rajion ZA, Luddin N. Nasofacial morphometric analysis for nasal reconstruction. J Teknol. 2015;76(7):81-85. [Link] [DOI:10.11113/jt.v76.5719]
33. Kumari KL, Babu PV, Kumari PK, Nagamani M. A study of cephalic index and facial index in Visakhapatnam, Andhra Pradesh, India. Int J Res Med Sci. 2015;3(3):656-8. [Link] [DOI:10.5455/2320-6012.ijrms20150324]